30 BEST Games Like Company of Heroes 3

The latest addition to the Company of Heroes franchise has arrived with a bang, and it is bigger and better than ever before. Company of Heroes 3 is an action-packed strategy game that offers players the ultimate experience in real-time battle, tactics, and strategy. If you’re someone who just loves to experience the RTT and RTS titles, then our 30 games like Company of Heroes 3 guide has listed them all. 

Here is a quick look at our picks:

StarCraft II: Wings Of Liberty

Blizzard Entertainment created and released StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, a real-time strategy video game. It’s the sequel to the original StarCraft and uses the company’s in-house developed gaming engine. The game is set in the far future of the 26th century and follows the struggles of three alien races, the Terrans, the Protoss, and the Zerg, as they compete for dominance in the Milky Way galaxy.

The player assumes the role of a commander in one of three campaigns that each focus on a different species. Gameplay entails extensive strategic planning as players manipulate resources, construct armies, and defeat adversaries. Play throughout a number of different environments with your choice of a wide selection of unit types, each with its own special skills and play style. Furthermore, players may engage in online competition with one another thanks to the game’s cooperative and competitive multiplayer modes.

New players may feel overwhelmed by StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty’s challenging learning curve. Micromanagement is also heavily involved in the game, which may be challenging for certain players. The game’s gameplay may sometimes become stale due to its focus on the same few goals and fights over and over again.

Pros

• Engaging and immersive gameplay
• Beautifully designed graphics and environments
• Rich and compelling storyline

Cons

• Steep learning curve for beginners
• Online multiplayer can be intimidating
• Lack of unit diversity in single-player campaign

Halo Wars

Ensemble Studios created and released Halo Wars for Microsoft Game Studios as a real-time strategy game. It takes place in the Halo world and was published in 2009; it is a prequel to the original game. It’s simple to get around using a controller since the game’s engine was built with console play in mind. The futuristic warfare of the title has all the elements that you can find in a Game Like Company of Heroes 3. 

The game’s emphasis on being playable by anybody is a strong point. Those fresh to the real-time strategy genre will appreciate the game’s straightforward controls. The game’s story mode is also excellent, with a compelling narrative that delves into the backstory of the Halo world. The game’s visuals and soundtrack are also quite well done, making for a really dramatic experience for the player.

Some seasoned tactic players may be dissatisfied with the game’s simpler gaming mechanics, however. The multiplayer feature is shallow and lacks the usual customizing possibilities for the genre. As a final point, the game’s restricted unit choices might lead to monotonous fights, especially in the single-player campaign. Despite these issues, Halo Wars stands out as a great real-time strategy game, especially for platform players.

Pros

• Fast-paced, exciting gameplay
• Stunning visuals and detailed graphics
• Intuitive controls for both console and PC players

Cons

• Limited unit selection compared to other RTS games
• Weak storyline and character development
• Unbalanced online multiplayer

American Conquest

Ukrainian studio GSC Game World created American Conquest, and CDV Software released it for PC. The game takes place in North America between the 15th and 18th centuries, and players can assume the roles of a variety of historical factions, such as the Spanish, English, French, and native tribes. The game’s engine is based on the developer’s previous Cossacks games, but with some tweaks.

The massive scale of American Conquest’s battles, which can involve thousands of units, is one of the game’s defining characteristics. Players can arrange their armies in anything from squares and columns to circles and lines thanks to the game’s innovative formation system. Infantry, cavalry, artillery, and naval vessels are all available in the game, each with their own set of advantages and disadvantages.

American Conquest’s graphics are dated, which may put off some modern gamers. The game’s interface can be cumbersome at first, but it eventually becomes second nature. In addition, the learning curve is steep, especially for those who have never played a real-time strategy game before.

Pros

• Huge variety of units and factions to choose from
• In-depth campaign mode with multiple missions
• Accurate depiction of historic battles and events

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Unintuitive control scheme and interface
• Poor AI and pathfinding

Age Of Empires IV

Microsoft Game Studios and Relic Entertainment have collaborated to create the real-time strategy game Age of Empires IV. This fourth installment in the Age of Empires series contains both a single-player story that guides players through real-world events and a multiplayer option where they may battle it out with other players online.

The game offers many civilizations, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. New civilizations, such as the Delhi Sultanate and the Mongols, breathe life into the game. In addition to using troops and skills to battle enemies, players may construct buildings, collect resources, and train new units.

Yet, the tutorial system in Age of Empires IV may be confusing and difficult to understand for novice players. As an added downside, the game’s visuals have been criticized for seeming archaic in comparison to more recent strategy games. Lastly, the game’s single-player campaign may not be as long or interesting as in past entries in the series, which may disappoint some gamers.

Pros

• Beautifully designed graphics and environments
• Huge variety of units, factions, and gameplay modes
• Engaging single-player campaign

Cons

• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Simplistic gameplay compared to earlier titles in the series
• Lack of innovation in terms of new features and mechanics

Day Of Infamy

As a first-person shooter set during World War II, Day of Infamy was created by New World Interactive. The game has both single-player and multiplayer modes, and it emphasizes realism, collaboration, and strategic play. Teams of players work together to achieve goals like seizing and holding opponent control locations or destroying their supply lines.

Day of Infamy’s strong suit is the way it rewards players that work together and think strategically. Participants need to coordinate and communicate with one another to accomplish their goals. Players will find themselves immersed in the action thanks to the game’s realistic presentation of weapons, gear, and battlefields.

One of Day of Infamy’s downsides is that it has a high learning curve that makes it difficult for new players to get up to speed. Some players may find the game’s high strategic and coordinated requirements challenging. The multiplayer community is also quite tiny, which might make it hard to locate partners.

Pros

• Intense and immersive gameplay
• Realistic depiction of World War II battles
• Multiple game modes to choose from

Cons

• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Steep learning curve for new players

Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance

Created by Gas Powered Games and released by THQ, Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance is an expansion for the original real-time strategy game, Supreme Commander. It has a fresh storyline and a lot of new troops and gameplay innovations. The warfare is breathtaking it every aspect of the title will remind you that Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance is easily a game Like Company of Heroes 3.

The strategic zoom is the game’s defining feature, allowing players to zoom out for a birds-eye perspective of the battlefield or zoom in for minute control of individual troops. New experimental troops are introduced in the game; they are strong and distinctive, but they are very resource intensive to construct. In the game’s single-player campaign, you’ll learn the backstory of an extraterrestrial civilization called The Seraphim who have risen from a long sleep and are now out to destroy mankind.

Certain troops are much superior than others, which is one of the game’s many flaws. The poor pathfinding in the game causes troops to get often stuck and need the player’s assistance to progress. In addition, the game’s artificial intelligence (AI) may be manipulated by skilled players, leading to a monotonous experience.

Pros

• Huge variety of units and factions to choose from
• In-depth and strategic gameplay
• Multiple game modes, including multiplayer and skirmish

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Weak storyline and character development

Men of War: Assault Squad 2

Real-time strategy game Men of War: Assault Squad 2 was published in 2014 by Digitalmindsoft. World War II provides the backdrop, as many groups, each with their own special troops and powers, compete against one another. It’s a top-down strategy game where you command troops and gather resources to win.

The realistic and intricate gameplay is one of Men of War: Assault Squad 2’s key draws. Players must carefully plot their actions and take advantage of terrain and cover as the game places a premium on tactical warfare and resource management. Several vehicles and weaponry with unique abilities and weaknesses are at players’ disposal in this game.

New players may struggle with Men of War: Assault Squad 2 due to its complex controls and lack of tutorials. In addition, there are a few bugs and crashes in the game’s artificial intelligence. The game’s aesthetics are also nothing to write home about since they have archaic graphics that some gamers may find off-putting.

Pros

• Huge variety of units and factions to choose from
• In-depth and strategic gameplay
• Realistic depiction of World War II battles

Cons

• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Weak storyline and character development

Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends

In the real-time strategy game, Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends, Big Huge Games, and Microsoft Game Studios are responsible for creating and releasing the game, respectively. The game’s new plot is set in a fantastical universe and serves as a spiritual sequel to the original Rise of Nations game. The game was published in 2006, and it uses a custom Microsoft-built gaming engine.

The amazing world-building of the game, which combines technology and magic to create an interesting and immersive setting, is one of its defining characteristics. The gameplay is interesting because to the three different sides, each with their own unique troops and skills, and a large number of available heroes.

One of the game’s drawbacks, especially for newcomers, is a steep learning curve. The game’s repetitive nature is exacerbated by the fact that every combat and goal is the same. Finally, the visuals were cutting-edge back then, but they’ve clearly seen better days.

Pros

• Unique and creative mix of fantasy and technology
• Huge variety of units, factions, and gameplay modes
• Engaging single-player campaign

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Simplistic gameplay compared to earlier titles in the series
• Lack of innovation in terms of new features and mechanics

Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection

Developed by Petroglyph Games and released by Electronic Arts, The Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection is a remaster of the iconic real-time strategy game. This game is a remaster of the classic Command & Conquer and its expansion, Red Alert, including improved visuals and other contemporary conveniences. Several of the original voice actors returned to re-record their lines, and the game also has a restored soundtrack as a tribute to the series’ loyal fanbase.

The upgraded visuals in Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection are the game’s defining characteristic. They give the game a fresh lease of life while staying true to the original aesthetic style. The game is easier to get into for new players thanks to the updated user interface and enhanced multiplayer features.

The improved visuals and quality-of-life upgrades in the Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection are nice, but the gameplay is basically unaltered from the original games. Those used to more up-to-date RTS games may find this to be a drawback.

Pros

• Classic and beloved RTS games with modernized graphics and features
• Engaging and immersive gameplay with a huge variety of units and factions
• Large and active modding community

Cons

• Outdated game mechanics and features
• Lack of innovation in terms of new features and mechanics
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Homeworld: Deserts Of Kharak

Blackbird Interactive and Gearbox Software created and released Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak, a real-time strategy game. Set on the barren planet of Kharak, it serves as a prologue to the original Homeworld video games. The Unity game engine powers the 2016 release.

Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak’s environment is one of the game’s most distinctive qualities. It blends science fiction with desert combat to create a vibrant and interesting universe. An engaging single-player adventure awaits you, complete with a wide range of troops and technologies to uncover and perfect. The game has a multiplayer option where players may compete against one other via the internet.

Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak’s single story and small selection of multiplayer levels are two of the game’s biggest flaws. Because of its emphasis on strategic decision-making rather than fast-paced action, the game’s speed may be languid at times. Last but not least, the game’s visuals, albeit spectacular at the time, might look and feel old now.

Pros

• Unique and immersive sci-fi setting
• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on unit mobility and positioning
• Stunning graphics and environments

Cons

• Steep learning curve for new players
• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Close Combat: Invasion: Normandy

Atomic Games’ real-time tactics game Close Combat: Invasion: Normandy debuted in 2000. Battles between the Allies and the Axis powers in the Normandy campaign of World War Two are the main emphasis of this game. Titles based on Normandy will always give you vibes of games Like Company of Heroes 3 & this one does too. 

The game’s focus on strategy is one of its defining qualities. Gamers need to strategically deploy their forces and decide where to move them if they want to succeed. Players are encouraged to try out new tactics and techniques thanks to the game’s wide variety of troops, each of which has its own set of strengths and limitations.

Close Combat: Invasion: Normandy’s archaic visuals and interface is a major negative. Although it was groundbreaking when it came out, playing the game on contemporary hardware may be challenging, and inexperienced players may find the game’s interface to be too complex and aggravating.

Pros

• Realistic and historically accurate depiction of World War II battles
• Intense and immersive gameplay
• Deep and strategic gameplay mechanics

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Steep learning curve for new players

Iron Harvest

King Art Games created and Deep Silver released the real-time strategy video game Iron Harvest. Taking place in a 1920s parallel reality after the conclusion of World War I, the game is expected to be a unique experience for players. Set in Europe, the game pits players against one another as one of three distinct factions, each with their own special soldiers, powers, and capabilities.

Iron Harvest’s steampunk-inspired world is one of the game’s most impressive aspects. The game’s campaign mode is where players will spend the most of their time because of the game’s captivating tale.

The game’s extreme difficulty might be irritating for some players, which is one of Iron Harvest’s downsides. The game’s controls and user interface may be cumbersome and confusing at times, adding to the difficulty of effective resource management and army construction. Lastly, the steampunk setting is fascinating and novel, but it may turn off those gamers who aren’t familiar with the subgenre.

Pros

• Unique and creative mix of steampunk and World War I elements
• Huge variety of units and factions
• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on unit positioning and cover

Cons

• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Weak storyline and character development

Act of War: Direct Action

Real-time strategy game Act of War: Direct Action was created by Eugen Systems and released by Atari. The game takes place in a variety of locales throughout the globe and incorporates a modern military theme. It came out in 2005 and uses the dev team’s in-house game engine.

The game’s focus on cutting-edge military technology and strategies is one of its defining characteristics. Playable troops range from infantry to tanks and planes, and each has its own set of special skills and upgrading options. In addition to the story and skirmish modes, the game offers a wide selection of missions with goals ranging from base defense to base assault.

Act of War: Direct Action has fewer available units than other real-time strategy games, which might lead to monotonous play. In addition, there aren’t many tasks available for each party in the game’s campaign mode.

Pros

• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on unit mobility and tactics
• Huge variety of units and factions
• Large and active multiplayer community

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Weak storyline and character development

Empire Earth

A real-time strategy game, Empire Earth was created by Stainless Steel Studios and released by Sierra Entertainment. Released in 2001, the game is based on a tweaked version of the Genie engine seen in Age of Empires. Play as any of 14 unique civilizations, spanning from antiquity to the modern day.

Empire Earth’s innovative take on historical authenticity is one of the game’s most notable qualities. The game takes place over the course of 500 thousand years of human history, enabling players to go all the way into the nano era. With so many eras to choose from, players may have a varied and engaging experience with a vast variety of technology, troops, and buildings.

The steep learning curve is one of Empire Earth’s disadvantages. It might be daunting for novice players to get started since there are so many different eras and civilizations to pick from. Not to mention, there are instances when the game becomes tedious due to the similarity between different conflicts and their respective goals.

Pros

• Huge variety of units and factions across different historical eras
• Deep and strategic gameplay mechanics
• Large and active modding community

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail

Game-Labs created and released the real-time strategy and simulation game Supreme Admiral: Age of Sail. The game’s setting is the Age of Sail, and players will command naval troops in historical conflicts from that time. Released in 2021, Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail utilizes the developer’s in-house created game engine.

Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail’s dedication to historical realism is one of the game’s most notable qualities, with ships, uniforms, and locations that are meticulously recreated to look as they did in the era. It has both a story-driven campaign mode with several goals and a more open-ended sandbox mode where players may create their own.

Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail’s high difficulty might be frustrating for inexperienced players. The game’s instructional system is also unclear and could not fully prepare players for the game’s difficulty.

Pros

• Unique and immersive historical setting
• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on naval combat
• Stunning graphics and environments

Cons

• Steep learning curve for new players
• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Rise of Nations

The real-time strategy game Rise of Nations was created by Big Huge Games and distributed by Microsoft Game Studios. In 2003, the first game in the Rise of Nations series was launched. In this game, players steer their civilization through eight eras of human history, each requiring a distinct approach to city-building, resource management, and tactical fighting.

The breadth of options available to players in Rise of Nations is one of the game’s defining characteristics. Players may assume control of any of 18 distinct civilizations, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The game also has a robust tech tree that lets you enhance your army with new technology as you go through the game. The game has both a single-player story mode and online multiplayer modes where players may face off against one another.

The game’s high learning curve is one of its disadvantages since it might put off novice players. It’s important to remember that there’s a lot going on in this game, and that may make it difficult to focus at times.

Pros

• Unique mix of historical, technological, and fantastical elements
• Huge variety of units, factions, and gameplay modes
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Halo Wars 2

The second installment of the Halo Wars series, Halo Wars 2 was created by 343 Industries and Creative Assembly, and released by Microsoft Studios. It was launched in 2017 for Windows and Xbox One and is the sequel to the 2009 game Halo Wars. It’s based in the Halo world, and you get to lead armies of the UNSC and the Banished into combat.

Halo Wars 2 is distinguished by its rapid and exciting gameplay. Each troop has different strengths and weaknesses, so players will need to strategize to come out on top. There is also a compelling plot in the game, complete with interesting characters and intense fights.

Yet, when compared to other real-time strategy games, Halo Wars 2’s shallowness stands out as a major downside. Both the game’s campaign and its replay value are brief. Another issue is that the multiplayer mode’s matchmaking isn’t always fair, especially for inexperienced players.

Pros

• Engaging and immersive gameplay set in the Halo universe
• Unique and creative mix of sci-fi and RTS elements
• Large and active multiplayer community

Cons

• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Steep learning curve for new players

Shattered Union

PopTop Software and 2K Games created and distributed the turn-based strategy game Shattered Union. The game is set in a dystopian United States, where a new civil war has broken out and the nation is now split into opposing camps. The company’s unique gaming engine powered the 2005 edition of the game.

The novel idea of Shattered Union is one of the game’s strongest points since it provides a new and interesting spin on the strategy genre. You may choose from a broad array of settings and situations, and the game’s many troops each have their own unique strengths and limitations. The game also has an online multiplayer option where players may compete against one another.

Those seeking a more complicated strategic experience may be turned off by Shattered Union’s very simple gameplay. The game’s visuals were adequate for their day but may seem and feel old now.

Pros

• Unique and creative premise set in an alternate history of the United States
• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on political and economic management
• Large and active multiplayer community

Cons

• Outdated graphics and animations
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Limited unit and faction diversity

Supreme Commander 2

The real-time strategy game Supreme Commander 2 was created by Gas Powered Games and is the sequel to the first Supreme Commander. It uses the Gamebryo engine and came out in 2010. It’s the sequel to the first game in the series, and it has far superior visuals and gameplay.

Supreme Commander 2’s massive battles are one of the game’s defining aspects. Players may assemble their own armies and lead them into combat thanks to the game’s extensive selection of constructible soldiers and buildings. The game’s innovative “strategic zoom” function lets users see the whole battlefield at once, facilitating better unit coordination and assault planning.

There are still several issues with the game despite the great gameplay in Supreme Commander 2. There is a serious lack of variation among the factions. There are just three different factions to play as in the game, but each has its own special soldiers and buildings. With so little to choose from, the game risks becoming tedious after prolonged use.

Pros

• Huge variety of units and factions with unique abilities and strengths
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics
• Improved graphics and animations compared to the first game

Cons

• Simplified and streamlined gameplay mechanics compared to the first game
• Limited modding support compared to the first game
• Steep learning curve for new players

R.U.S.E.

Eugen Systems and Ubisoft created the real-time strategy game R.U.S.E. Allies, Germans, Italians, and the Soviet Union are just some of the playable sides in this World War II-era RTS. Launched in 2010, it utilizes the IRISZOOM gaming engine. The aerial & ground troops warfare easily makes this title a game Like Company of Heroes 3.

The capacity to utilize deceit and misdirection to get the upper hand in conflicts is a key characteristic of R.U.S.E. Rules are employed to accomplish this goal since they are unique skills that may be used to deceive and gain an edge over one’s opponents. There are many different forces to command, each with their own special skills, and many different battlefields to explore.

R.U.S.E.’s high learning curve is one of the game’s biggest downsides, since it may be scary to inexperienced players. There are just four different sides to select from, thus the game lacks diversity there as well. Last but not least, the game’s visuals, although spectacular at the time, might look and feel old now.

Pros

• Unique and innovative gameplay mechanics with a focus on deception and misdirection
• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and immersive singleplayer campaign

Cons

• Poor AI and pathfinding for units
• Limited modding support and customization options
• Steep learning curve for new players

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn Of War II

THQ and developer Relic Entertainment released the real-time strategy game Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II. It was out in 2009 and is the sequel to the original Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War game. It’s set in the 41st millenium and follows the Space Marines as they fight against the Tyranids.

Both a single-player storyline and online multiplayer battles are available in this game. The gameplay focuses on unit management and tactical battle, requiring players to strike a balance between tactical maneuvering and strategic planning. The ability to personalize and level up individual troops is one of the game’s most distinctive aspects since it lets players build their own unique armies.

Some aficionados of the genre may be dissatisfied by the fact that base-building elements are absent from Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II. Also, those wishing for a more grandiose strategy game may be turned off by the game’s emphasis on small-scale combat and individual unit control.

Pros

• Engaging and immersive gameplay set in the Warhammer 40,000 universe
• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and immersive singleplayer campaign

Cons

• Limited base-building and resource management compared to the first game
• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Limited modding support and customization options

World In Conflict

The real-time strategy game World in War was created by Massive Entertainment and released by Sierra Entertainment. In this parallel timeline, the Soviet Union has overrun Western Europe and the United States. The player leads an international coalition of nations known as NATO in an effort to halt the invasion and save the free world.

World in War stands out from the crowd because to its innovative gameplay mechanics, which put an emphasis on tactical battles and strategic choices. Players may alter the tide of battle by calling in air attacks, artillery, and other reinforcements in this game. In addition to the single-player campaign, the game offers a full online multiplayer option where players may compete against each other.

The linear campaign in World in War is one of its flaws since it may become boring quickly. Also, the game’s visuals, albeit spectacular at the time, might seem and feel obsolete in comparison to modern games. But contrasted to the game’s fantastic multiplayer mode, the single-player campaign might seem lacking.

Pros

• Unique and immersive setting in an alternate history of the Cold War
• Engaging and strategic gameplay with a focus on combined arms tactics
• Large and active multiplayer community

Cons

• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Steep learning curve for new players

Blitzkrieg 3

Recently, I got to try out the real-time strategy game Blitzkrieg 3. It’s Nival’s third entry in the Blitzkrieg series, and it was created and released by the company. Multiplatform availability since its 2017 release. After giving it a try on PC, I can say that I enjoyed myself quite a bit.

The game’s dedication to historical realism was a big selling point for me when I first played Blitzkrieg 3. Battles from the Second World War serve as inspiration for tasks in the single-player campaign. I particularly enjoyed seeing the many adaptations of wartime buildings and troops.

Intuitive design choices made the game’s mechanics accessible to me. It’s a great entry point for newcomers to the genre, but veterans may be put off by the game’s lack of depth. The game’s visuals are OK, but they didn’t blow me away or anything.

Pros

• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics
• Improved graphics and animations compared to the previous games in the series

Cons

• Poor optimization and technical issues
• Limited modding support and customization options
• Steep learning curve for new players

Steel Division 2

Real-time strategic game Steel Division 2 was created by Eugen Systems and distributed by Focus Home Interactive. Set during World War II, the game focuses on strategic, turn-based combat where players must strategically place their soldiers, manage their resources, and coordinate their assaults to triumph.

Steel Division 2 stands out from the crowd because to its extensive selection of historically authentic troops, battlefields, and scenarios. The game’s amazing realism is further highlighted by the fact that troops respond in accordance with their strengths and limitations and the environment really affects the course of battle.

New players may find Steel Division 2’s high learning curve to be a frustrating obstacle. The game’s emphasis on realism and massive scale combat may perhaps be too much for certain players. Lastly, the game has excellent visuals, although they might be taxing on less powerful hardware.

Pros

• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics with a focus on combined arms tactics
• Improved graphics and animations compared to the first game

Cons

• Limited modding support and customization options
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds

Ensemble Studios and LucasArts teamed together to create Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds, a real-time strategy game that LucasArts released in 2001. The game is built on the same engine as Age of Empires II and is set in the Star Wars universe, letting players take command of one of many different factions and fight massive battles on the ground and in the stars.

Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds stands out thanks in large part to the meticulousness with which it recreates the Star Wars world. There are many different types of troops to choose from in this game, from regular infantry to AT-AT walkers and X-wings straight out of the Star Wars universe. The game also has a map builder whereby users may design their own levels and missions for their own personal campaigns.

The game’s archaic visuals are a turnoff for some players, and this is one of Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds’ few negatives. Certain troops and abilities also seem imbalanced, and the game’s mechanics may be clumsy and unintuitive at times.

Pros

• Engaging and immersive gameplay set in the Star Wars universe
• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Improved graphics and animations compared to the original Age of Empires II

Cons

• Limited unit and faction diversity compared to other RTS games
• Outdated graphics and animations compared to modern RTS games
• Limited modding support and customization options

Wargame: Red Dragon

I recently got the opportunity to play the real-time strategy game Wargame: Red Dragon. Focus Home Interactive published the game that was created by Eugen Systems. This is the third installment in the Wargame series, and it came out in 2014. The game takes place during the Cold War and utilizes the IRISZOOM engine.

Wargame: Red Dragon’s dedication to realism stands out among other notable aspects. The game has a vast variety of troops and vehicles modeled on those of the Cold War period. The game’s maps are impressively realistic, depicting the settings of the era’s actual conflicts down to the smallest detail.

Newcomers to the genre may find the game’s learning curve challenging. The game is difficult to get the hang of for newcomers to the genre, and mastering it calls for a lot of time and effort.

Pros

• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics with a focus on combined arms tactics
• Large and active multiplayer community

Cons

• Steep learning curve for new players
• Limited singleplayer content
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Steel Division: Normandy 44

Steel Division: Normandy 44 was created by Eugen Systems and released by Paradox Interactive. It is a tactical real-time strategy game. The game is based on the WWII Normandy invasion and contains massive battles with hundreds of playable troops. This video game is by far the best game Like Company of Heroes 3 that checks all the boxes of military combat. 

Steel Division: Normandy 44 stands out because to its meticulous attention to detail in terms of both historical authenticity and tactical gameplay. Players will need to carefully plan and execute their plans to gain an advantage over the game’s many different units, each of which has its own strengths and limitations. Adding to the game’s depth is a frontline system that shifts and evolves as the combat goes.

Steel Division: Normandy 44’s high learning curve is one of the game’s disadvantages. It might be tough to know where to direct your attention in the face of the game’s massive magnitude and intricate dynamics.

Pros

• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and strategic gameplay mechanics with a focus on combined arms tactics
• Improved graphics and animations compared to the previous games in the series

Cons

• Limited modding support and customization options
• Steep learning curve for new players
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Tom Clancy’s EndWar

Ubisoft Shanghai created and distributed Tom Clancy’s EndWar, a real-time tactics video game. This 2008 publication imagines a future in which the United States, the European Union, and Russia are engaged in a devastating third global war. The game’s voice command mechanism is revolutionary in that it enables players to direct their troops with nothing but their own voices.

Both local and internet multiplayer modes are available in this game. Gameplay focuses on completing goals and defeating foes by controlling and deploying a variety of troops, including tanks, infantry, and helicopters.

Tom Clancy’s EndWar suffers from a lack of depth in terms of unit diversity and strategic complexity. The small pool of troops and strategies in the game might make fights seem stale after a while. As a further annoyance, the voice command system isn’t always reliable or quick to respond.

Pros

• Unique and innovative gameplay mechanics with a focus on voice commands and strategic management
• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Engaging and immersive singleplayer campaign

Cons

• Limited modding support and customization options
• Limited unit and faction diversity
• Poor optimization and technical issues

Star Wars: Empire At War

The real-time strategy game Star Wars: Empire at War was created by Petroglyph Games and released by LucasArts. The game, which came out in 2006, lets fans of the Star Wars franchise take command of their own corner of the galaxy by managing resources and constructing troops. The game’s outstanding visuals and audio were created using the Alamo engine.

Switching between ground and space conflicts in Star Wars: Empire at War is one of the game’s most distinctive aspects. Both the Galactic Empire and the Rebel Alliance provide a wide array of forces for players to take control of, from standard soldiers to enormous starships.

The visuals in Star Wars: Empire at War may not be as spectacular now as they were when the game was released. The game’s difficulty is often toned down since the AI might seem slow to react.

Pros

• Engaging and immersive gameplay set in the Star Wars universe
• Large and diverse selection of units and factions
• Unique and innovative mix of ground and space combat

Cons

• Limited modding support and customization options
• Outdated graphics and animations compared to modern RTS games
• Limited unit and faction diversity compared to other RTS games

Company Of Heroes 2

As a real-time strategy game, Company of Heroes 2 was created by Relic Entertainment and released by Sega. This sequel to the highly regarded Company of Heroes is set on the Eastern Front during World War Two. The game was launched in 2013, and it uses Relic’s in-house developed Essence 3.0 gaming engine.

Company of Heroes 2 stands out for its in-depth gameplay, which challenges players to manage resources, construct and lead armies, and devise strategies to win victory. The game’s dynamic weather system may provide players with different difficulties and opportunities.

For inexperienced players, the steep learning curve in Company of Heroes 2 may be a frustrating obstacle. Also, there are occasions when the game’s Intelligence seems off, making some fights more challenging than others.

Pros

• Immersive and historically accurate portrayal of World War II
• Dynamic weather effects add strategy to gameplay
• Intense multiplayer matches and variety of game modes

Cons

• Reliance on micromanagement and resource management can be overwhelming
• Unbalanced and overpowered units can be frustrating for some players

Summary

With that we have reached to the end of our Games Like Company of Heroes 3 guide. Before you move onto another page, consider checking out our 15 Best Motorcycle Games On Xbox, Top 110 BEST SNES Games of All Time, and Top 30 BEST Gacha Games To Play guides.

Next: 

• Best Apple Arcade Games
• BEST Open World PS5 Games
• BEST Sniper Games On PS4
• Best Nintendo Switch Games